H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Misaki Doi H2H: 2-2
Nao Hibino and Misaki Doi are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Misaki Doi leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nao Hibino won the 2021 Charleston 2 third round 7-5 5-7 6-6 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2021* | Charleston 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nao Hibino | 7-5 5-7 6-6 (ret.) | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2019* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Nao Hibino | 6-3 6-2 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2017* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Misaki Doi | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2016* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Misaki Doi | 6-3 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Misaki Doi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |