H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nao Hibino vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 2-1

Nao Hibino holds a 2–1 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2021 Indian Wells Open first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nao Hibino
Japan Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zarina Diyas #108 6-3 6-3 Nao Hibino #121 Match data Oct 8, 2021* R128 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Nao Hibino #84 7-5 6-3 Zarina Diyas #76 Match data Sep 24, 2020* R16 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Nao Hibino #146 6-1 3-2 (ret.) Zarina Diyas #80 Match data Sep 13, 2019* R16 Hiroshima International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nao Hibino #228 #56 1,050 1,726 80 121 39.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nao Hibino Zarina Diyas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0
20 2015 6–2 75.0% #66 1,559 0 1 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0
21 2016 19–22 46.3% #94 1,639 0 1 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0
22 2017 11–17 39.3% #97 1,544 0 1 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0
23 2018 5–10 33.3% #114 1,597 0 1 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1
24 2019 6–5 54.5% #106 1,619 0 2 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1
25 2020 9–6 60.0% #73 1,647 0 2 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1
26 2021 5–17 22.7% #129 1,527 0 2 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1
27 2022 4–6 40.0% #138 1,578 0 2 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1
28 2023 9–12 42.9% #94 1,657 0 3 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1
29 2024 4–16 20.0% #145 1,603 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2025 2–7 22.2% #174 1,514 0 3 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1
31 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,557 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nao Hibino Zarina Diyas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2015 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 2017 11 11 22 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2019 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2021 1 9 10 10.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2023 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2024 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2025 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 83 148 43.9% 13 27 40 32.5% 2 11 13 15.4% — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/195 of Nao Hibino's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nao Hibino Zarina Diyas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8%
21 2016 39/41 1.4 2.8 65.7% 58.2% 49.2% 50.1% 54.8% 54.9% 41.0% 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1%
22 2017 26/28 1.8 3.6 64.7% 58.6% 45.9% 54.7% 42.0% 53.9% 38.7% 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9%
23 2018 13/15 2.2 2.8 61.4% 60.0% 45.3% 59.2% 40.6% 54.4% 41.1% 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1%
24 2019 11/11 2.6 2.8 64.0% 64.7% 45.9% 56.5% 43.7% 57.7% 43.6% 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8%
25 2020 15/15 1.1 2.7 65.5% 62.6% 45.8% 52.9% 41.8% 56.6% 46.8% 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1%
26 2021 21/23 1.8 2.9 65.0% 55.1% 36.6% 39.9% 47.2% 48.2% 39.1% 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2%
27 2022 10/10 1.6 2.4 70.4% 59.9% 44.7% 43.5% 51.8% 55.2% 46.5% 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3%
28 2023 21/21 1.4 2.2 67.4% 58.0% 47.2% 47.1% 60.3% 54.4% 42.1% 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6%
29 2024 20/20 1.3 3.1 65.6% 55.3% 43.7% 48.7% 50.3% 51.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2025 3/9 2.0 3.0 64.6% 58.9% 48.8% 52.8% 45.8% 54.6% 43.7% 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0%
31 2026 1/2 2.0 3.0 63.2% 68.8% 32.1% 71.4% 25.0% 55.3% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4%
Career — 180/203 1.6 2.9 65.5% 58.6% 45.3% 50.1% 48.9% 53.8% 41.3% — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nao Hibino Zarina Diyas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31
20 2015 1560 105.6 — — — — +14 — — 66.7% +0.60 1–0 — — +0.71 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75
21 2016 1639 113.6 -1.11 -1.79 0.909 48.3% -18 -53 -78 44.0% -0.55 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +0.05 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00
22 2017 1544 109.2 -2.04 -3.51 0.840 47.2% +35 -50 — 39.0% -0.76 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — +0.77 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38
23 2018 1597 121.9 -0.94 -1.44 0.902 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.87 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.36 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69
24 2019 1619 112.2 -0.45 -0.48 1.031 50.5% +13 — — 45.8% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35
25 2020 1648 124.3 +0.36 +2.53 1.079 51.6% -35 -88 — 57.6% +0.73 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.20 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02
26 2021 1528 96.1 -6.17 -3.62 0.754 44.2% -45 -13 -10 22.7% -2.09 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43
27 2022 1578 112.0 -0.72 +0.28 1.038 50.9% -34 — — 47.6% +0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.93 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46
28 2023 1658 122.0 -1.96 -1.76 0.923 48.2% -9 — — 43.5% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 +0.98 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23
29 2024 1603 118.1 -4.14 -2.60 0.784 44.9% +36 -97 -114 28.6% -1.57 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2025 1514 109.3 -1.77 -0.47 0.962 49.4% -11 +10 — 30.0% -1.65 0–2 — — -0.04 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15
31 2026 1557 107.7 -0.02 +0.29 0.929 48.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.69 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
Career — 1726 117.5 -2.08 -1.72 0.893 47.8% 0 -46 -68 40.3% -0.70 25–27 (48%) 18–19 (49%) 101.7 +2.42 — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.