H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Broady vs Laura Robson H2H: 1-0

Naomi Broady holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Robson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2016 US Open first round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Broady
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Robson
Great Britain Age 32 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Broady #82 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 Laura Robson #254 Match data Aug 31, 2016* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Broady #1,209 #76 875 1,604 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laura Robson #764 #27 1,685 1,710 39 63 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Broady Laura Robson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #517 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #403 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 1–5 16.7% #217 1,474 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2011 3–5 37.5% #133 1,508 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 16–15 51.6% #53 1,657 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #298 1,484 0 0 2013 18–22 45.0% #44 1,661 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #287 1,469 0 0 2014 0–2 0.0% #916 1,630 0 0
21 2011 1–2 33.3% #196 1,472 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #557 1,594 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #287 1,463 0 0 2016 1–8 11.1% #222 1,512 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2017 0–2 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
24 2014 1–3 25.0% #170 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2015 5–5 50.0% #121 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 10–15 40.0% #91 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2017 6–11 35.3% #117 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2018 1–3 25.0% #250 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Broady Laura Robson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 10 13 23 43.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 22 42 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 18 22 18.2% — 22 33 55 40.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 18 27 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 59/66 of Naomi Broady's and 95/101 of Laura Robson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Broady Laura Robson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 10.0 14.0 59.6% 66.1% 42.1% 61.5% 50.0% 56.4% 37.8%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 4.7 4.0 63.7% 69.3% 38.8% 68.2% 31.9% 58.6% 30.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 8/8 2.4 5.8 54.8% 65.8% 40.9% 41.9% 43.5% 54.4% 42.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/31 4.2 5.8 57.1% 68.1% 44.4% 51.4% 44.3% 57.9% 43.5%
19 2009 1/1 15.0 3.0 57.6% 70.6% 42.0% 61.5% 33.3% 58.5% 40.0% 2013 37/40 4.5 5.8 55.6% 69.7% 43.4% 54.0% 44.4% 58.0% 42.6%
20 2010 1/1 8.0 2.0 56.5% 74.4% 33.3% 50.0% 28.6% 56.5% 35.7% 2014 2/2 4.0 3.5 59.1% 55.8% 36.7% 41.7% 50.0% 47.7% 34.7%
21 2011 3/3 12.7 4.3 54.0% 75.3% 48.4% 69.0% 15.8% 63.3% 34.5% 2015 2/2 5.0 11.0 57.6% 68.6% 35.7% 66.4% 34.1% 54.9% 38.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 9/9 2.8 5.3 56.5% 58.2% 41.5% 51.8% 36.2% 51.0% 38.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 2.5 4.5 58.7% 66.8% 43.5% 21.4% 3.6% 57.1% 34.4%
24 2014 4/4 9.3 4.3 56.9% 70.8% 43.8% 46.7% 42.1% 59.1% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 6/10 10.3 3.3 63.4% 78.6% 45.8% 46.4% 27.9% 66.7% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 23/26 8.4 4.8 57.9% 70.2% 39.9% 50.5% 38.0% 57.4% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 17/17 9.6 4.1 57.9% 74.7% 44.9% 49.7% 46.1% 62.0% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 4/4 12.5 3.5 58.4% 64.4% 50.3% 64.0% 10.0% 58.8% 30.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59/67 9.6 4.2 58.2% 72.3% 43.3% 51.6% 36.3% 60.2% 34.0% — 95/102 4.1 5.8 56.8% 67.4% 42.7% 52.3% 41.8% 56.8% 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Broady Laura Robson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1490 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.05
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1484 103.3 -0.52 +0.53 0.867 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1474 102.2 +0.56 -5.19 0.742 45.8% — — +98 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — -0.50
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1508 110.8 +0.58 -0.57 0.932 48.6% +1 — +42 26.7% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1658 135.1 +1.17 +0.07 1.034 51.0% -32 -64 -60 52.2% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.14
19 2009 1485 100.3 -1.38 -3.59 0.963 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 2013 1662 129.1 +1.89 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -53 -51 -31 46.2% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 96.6 -0.17
20 2010 1470 99.4 -5.23 -2.65 0.821 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 2014 1630 100.1 -4.77 -2.42 0.663 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.11
21 2011 1473 95.0 +1.81 -0.83 0.939 48.5% — — +46 37.5% -0.62 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09 2015 1595 101.1 -0.86 -1.36 0.846 46.6% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.19
22 2012 1463 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 2016 1512 105.4 -2.56 -1.79 0.776 45.0% +6 +50 — 15.8% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1465 96.8 -2.08 -0.78 0.802 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.18
24 2014 1460 101.3 -0.21 -3.52 0.709 45.2% — — +50 30.0% -1.10 1–1 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1511 105.2 +3.12 -3.00 0.975 48.6% +44 — -16 47.8% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1495 109.2 +0.76 -4.87 0.847 47.1% +47 — -85 41.0% -0.85 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1551 114.6 +2.49 -5.32 0.876 47.9% +6 — -166 42.9% -0.71 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1485 104.1 +0.54 -1.89 0.732 44.6% +4 — — 30.0% -1.40 1–1 1–1 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1445 88.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1434 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1604 108.0 +1.33 -4.25 0.854 47.3% +30 — -43 39.8% -0.76 13–16 (45%) 11–13 (46%) 99.4 -0.26 — 1710 126.6 +0.75 -0.88 0.952 49.1% -36 -35 -6 39.8% -0.43 11–16 (41%) 9–18 (33%) 96.1 -0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.