H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 2-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2022 Miami Open fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #77 6-3 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #50 Match data Mar 30, 2022* R16 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 6-4 6-0 Alison Riske-Amritraj #24 Match data Oct 3, 2019 R16 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #90 7-5 3-2 (ret.) Naomi Osaka #92 Match data Apr 30, 2016 Q2 Q Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.