H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova H2H: 2-2

Naomi Osaka and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2025 Wimbledon third round 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #50 3-6 6-4 6-4 Naomi Osaka #53 Match data Jul 4, 2025 R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Naomi Osaka #3 6-1 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #39 Match data Feb 10, 2021* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 6-2 6-3 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #41 Match data Sep 22, 2019* F Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #21 6-3 6-3 Naomi Osaka #64 Match data Oct 14, 2017* QF Hong Kong Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 250 137 64.6% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,051 4 7 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12
29 — — — — — — — 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12
31 — — — — — — — 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,810 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 189 89 278 68.0% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% — 27.8% 14.3%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.22
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 — 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51
27 2025 1960 153.1 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +52 -122 -247 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +0.96 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 — 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49
28 2026 2051 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% -3 -102 -109 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.2 -0.78 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 — 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 — — 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.51
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 — 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1811 137.5 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.64
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1727 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +27 — — 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 — -0.27
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +34 -156 -154 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.2 -1.63 — 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.