H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 2-1

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Barbora Strycova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2018 Pan Pacific Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #7 6-3 6-4 Barbora Strycova #25 Match data Sep 22, 2018* QF Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Naomi Osaka #59 6-1 0-6 6-4 Barbora Strycova #23 Match data Jul 6, 2017* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Barbora Strycova #40 7-5 6-2 Naomi Osaka #182 Match data Sep 24, 2015* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Barbora Strycova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Barbora Strycova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Barbora Strycova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Barbora Strycova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.