H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Camila Osorio H2H: 3-1
Naomi Osaka holds a 3–1 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2026 Madrid second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 6-2 7-5 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2026 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |