H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 3-2

Naomi Osaka holds a 3–2 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 Australian Open first round 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Caroline Garcia
France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #51 6-3 3-6 6-3 Caroline Garcia #67 Match data Jan 13, 2025 R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Caroline Garcia #27 7-6(4) 7-5 Naomi Osaka #229 Match data Mar 24, 2024* R32 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #747 7-5 6-4 Caroline Garcia #21 Match data Feb 13, 2024* R64 Qatar Open WTA 1000 Hard
Caroline Garcia #19 6-4 7-6(2) Naomi Osaka #831 Match data Jan 16, 2024* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Naomi Osaka #3 6-2 6-3 Caroline Garcia #43 Match data Feb 11, 2021* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Caroline Garcia
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6
25 — — — — — — — 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Caroline Garcia
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Caroline Garcia
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Caroline Garcia
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.70
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 — — 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 — 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 — 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 — 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1724 135.4 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 — — 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.54
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.