H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Daria Saville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2022 Pan Pacific Open first round 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daria Saville
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #48 1-0 (ret.) Daria Saville #55 Match data Sep 22, 2022* R32 Pan Pacific Open WTA 500 Hard
Daria Saville #45 6-4 6-2 Naomi Osaka #84 Match data Aug 14, 2016 Q2 Q Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Daria Saville #226 #20 2,135 1,858 159 156 50.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Daria Saville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #539 1,493 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #226 1,508 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2013 2–6 25.0% #149 1,462 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2014 1–1 50.0% #233 1,483 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2015 20–21 48.8% #36 1,675 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2016 27–20 57.4% #25 1,836 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2017 33–22 60.0% #25 1,794 0 1
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2018 27–23 54.0% #35 1,781 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2019 6–16 27.3% #242 1,603 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2020 1–1 50.0% #450 1,617 0 1
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2021 2–2 50.0% #419 1,645 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2022 19–15 55.9% #53 1,738 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2023 6–8 42.9% #204 1,686 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2024 11–14 44.0% #108 1,667 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2025 3–5 37.5% #197 1,661 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Daria Saville
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 13 17 30 43.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2022 16 10 26 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 105 101 206 51.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 15 21 36 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 287/316 of Daria Saville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Daria Saville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% 2010 1/1 5.0 4.0 46.6% 59.3% 38.7% 44.4% 33.3% 48.3% 32.7%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2012 2/2 4.0 3.0 63.0% 65.8% 46.5% 33.3% 60.0% 58.2% 55.1%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2013 8/8 2.9 6.5 55.6% 56.5% 36.1% 47.6% 53.1% 47.6% 40.4%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2014 2/2 2.5 6.0 61.7% 57.5% 39.0% 39.8% 50.0% 50.3% 47.0%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2015 31/41 2.5 4.6 66.2% 62.3% 49.2% 54.6% 52.2% 57.6% 41.8%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2016 37/47 1.9 3.9 63.1% 62.0% 47.1% 52.1% 44.7% 56.5% 44.0%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2017 54/55 2.7 4.8 62.9% 64.0% 45.6% 46.7% 50.8% 57.1% 45.6%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2018 48/51 1.8 7.7 65.7% 62.8% 37.3% 53.1% 51.4% 54.1% 45.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 21/22 1.0 4.2 66.4% 56.8% 43.9% 45.7% 46.5% 52.4% 41.3%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2020 2/2 0.5 5.0 59.8% 62.1% 52.1% 75.0% 73.2% 58.6% 43.5%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2021 4/4 2.0 4.0 57.5% 66.2% 46.6% 52.5% 44.5% 57.9% 47.1%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2022 33/34 2.2 5.0 64.1% 64.5% 44.3% 58.4% 45.6% 57.5% 44.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 14/14 1.3 4.8 63.7% 61.1% 38.3% 45.4% 53.3% 53.3% 45.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 25/25 2.1 6.2 67.4% 57.8% 41.9% 59.3% 57.6% 52.5% 45.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 5/8 1.0 5.0 69.5% 56.9% 39.9% 48.9% 60.2% 51.1% 40.2%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 287/316 2.1 5.3 64.3% 61.8% 43.5% 51.8% 50.3% 55.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Daria Saville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2010 1494 101.6 +1.65 -1.80 0.633 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2012 1508 107.7 +0.29 +3.39 1.317 57.0% — — — 50.0% +1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2013 1462 101.0 -2.47 -1.24 0.771 44.0% +3 — — 26.3% -1.63 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.05
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2014 1483 109.1 +0.25 +0.24 0.946 48.8% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2015 1675 139.1 +0.59 +1.21 0.985 50.0% -73 -34 -29 50.0% -0.05 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 106.8 -1.55
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2016 1837 143.7 +0.70 +1.71 1.011 50.3% -38 -114 -194 54.4% +0.28 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -1.91
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2017 1795 139.8 +0.45 +2.93 1.061 51.3% +20 -6 -173 57.7% +0.43 14–13 (52%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 +1.08
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2018 1781 141.0 -2.19 +2.60 0.991 49.8% +14 0 -108 52.2% -0.08 11–8 (58%) 13–1 (93%) 108.4 -0.58
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1604 107.6 -2.88 -1.35 0.868 46.7% +84 +22 +39 27.7% -1.28 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 -0.63
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2020 1617 108.7 +0.59 +1.52 1.052 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.14
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2021 1646 128.1 +1.67 +2.64 1.117 52.5% +67 — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +2 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2022 1738 136.6 +0.54 +0.98 1.039 50.8% +82 -119 -95 53.7% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.65
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1687 124.8 -0.97 +1.63 0.980 49.5% +59 +5 — 45.2% +0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -0.28
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1668 125.0 -3.56 +1.68 0.966 49.2% +38 -36 +6 45.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.44
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1662 123.9 -0.99 -0.65 0.821 45.9% +19 — — 35.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.37
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1859 140.0 -0.68 +1.60 0.990 49.8% +11 -29 -92 49.6% -0.03 59–51 (54%) 42–41 (51%) 102.9 -1.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.