H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Kateryna Volodko

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Naomi Osaka vs Kateryna Volodko.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kateryna Volodko #89 7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 Naomi Osaka #144 Match data Jan 3, 2016 Q4 Q Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 — — — — — — —
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Kateryna Volodko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Kateryna Volodko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Kateryna Volodko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.