H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Kiki Bertens: 2–1 excluding walkovers; 2–2 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Naomi Osaka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2020 Brisbane International quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Kiki Bertens | Match data | Jan 11, 2020* | QF | Brisbane International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Kiki Bertens | (w/o) | Naomi Osaka | Match data | May 18, 2019* | QF | Italian Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Kiki Bertens | 6-3 (ret.) | Naomi Osaka | Match data | Oct 26, 2018 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Naomi Osaka | 6-4 6-2 | Kiki Bertens | Match data | Feb 25, 2016* | R32 | Acapulco | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #18 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,178 | 253 | 139 | 64.5% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Kiki Bertens | — | #4 | 5,430 | 2,004 | 215 | 172 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,902 | 1 | 2 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,046 | 2 | 5 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,111 | 3 | 6 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,039 | 4 | 7 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,933 | 4 | 7 | 2016 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #22 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #31 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,872 | 4 | 7 | 2018 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,910 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2025 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,959 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 57–26 | 68.7% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2026 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #18 | 2,030 | 4 | 7 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 29 | 13 | 42 | 69.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 30 | 7 | 37 | 81.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 84.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26 | 15 | 41 | 63.4% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30 | 18 | 48 | 62.5% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 192 | 91 | 283 | 67.8% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 25 | 17 | 42 | 59.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 98 | 107 | 205 | 47.8% | 94 | 45 | 139 | 67.6% | 20 | 19 | 39 | 51.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 355/391 of Naomi Osaka's and 361/387 of Kiki Bertens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2014 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 55.4% | 65.3% | 44.8% | 33.6% | 49.2% | 55.5% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 33/33 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 55.2% | 69.6% | 48.3% | 54.8% | 51.5% | 59.9% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 40/41 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 55.9% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 45.6% | 46.3% | 57.5% | 40.2% | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 53.7% | 61.1% | 32.3% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 47.8% | 40.9% |
| 20 | 2018 | 55/60 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 59.7% | 71.1% | 48.8% | 55.8% | 55.7% | 61.9% | 45.3% | 2012 | 23/23 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 60.5% | 65.3% | 41.1% | 49.3% | 48.2% | 55.7% | 42.3% |
| 21 | 2019 | 50/53 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 60.2% | 73.1% | 47.9% | 56.3% | 51.0% | 63.1% | 44.4% | 2013 | 30/33 | 2.2 | 5.5 | 57.6% | 61.8% | 42.9% | 51.9% | 45.5% | 54.1% | 43.7% |
| 22 | 2020 | 18/19 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 59.0% | 76.0% | 53.0% | 64.2% | 43.2% | 66.5% | 42.5% | 2014 | 22/25 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 60.8% | 44.5% | 49.6% | 41.8% | 53.8% | 45.8% |
| 23 | 2021 | 21/28 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 53.5% | 76.2% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 52.6% | 64.9% | 43.6% | 2015 | 19/24 | 1.9 | 5.1 | 63.9% | 59.1% | 51.6% | 53.8% | 57.3% | 56.1% | 36.8% |
| 24 | 2022 | 22/26 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 51.4% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 61.9% | 44.1% | 62.7% | 41.4% | 2016 | 45/46 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 67.4% | 47.6% | 55.6% | 44.9% | 59.0% | 46.0% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 54/55 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 55.5% | 71.4% | 43.7% | 54.1% | 50.0% | 59.1% | 45.9% |
| 26 | 2024 | 36/38 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 75.1% | 51.1% | 56.3% | 50.1% | 64.0% | 40.4% | 2018 | 64/69 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 58.0% | 69.1% | 47.9% | 51.8% | 51.7% | 60.0% | 46.8% |
| 27 | 2025 | 34/46 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 56.9% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 52.5% | 53.6% | 63.5% | 45.2% | 2019 | 76/83 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 57.1% | 72.6% | 47.2% | 58.5% | 48.8% | 61.8% | 43.6% |
| 28 | 2026 | 42/43 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 58.6% | 72.8% | 49.3% | 54.5% | 46.9% | 63.1% | 42.2% | 2020 | 19/19 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 63.7% | 68.3% | 43.5% | 59.6% | 57.0% | 59.1% | 47.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8/9 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 64.5% | 58.8% | 40.4% | 44.2% | 43.1% | 51.9% | 37.9% |
| Career | — | 355/393 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 57.0% | 72.6% | 48.9% | 54.8% | 50.2% | 62.3% | 43.0% | — | 361/387 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 58.6% | 67.8% | 45.8% | 54.1% | 49.0% | 58.5% | 44.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2014 | 1531 | 113.6 | +0.17 | +0.57 | 0.923 | 48.4% | +17 | — | — | 45.5% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 1509 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1700 | 133.1 | +3.18 | +0.66 | 1.091 | 51.9% | -10 | -101 | — | 60.0% | +0.65 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 101.0 | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1696 | 132.1 | +1.30 | -2.12 | 0.947 | 48.9% | +6 | -84 | -46 | 45.8% | -0.18 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.8 | -1.51 | 2011 | 1494 | 97.6 | +1.77 | -1.03 | 0.783 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1902 | 160.7 | +5.21 | +2.94 | 1.190 | 53.8% | +17 | -236 | -168 | 67.5% | +1.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.8 | -2.09 | 2012 | 1581 | 118.0 | +0.05 | -1.16 | 0.955 | 49.1% | -24 | +10 | +3 | 47.1% | -0.27 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.6 | -0.86 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2047 | 154.9 | +5.80 | +1.63 | 1.202 | 53.6% | +30 | -229 | -350 | 68.4% | +1.22 | 17–2 (89%) | 10–4 (71%) | 116.1 | +0.63 | 2013 | 1552 | 121.8 | -1.34 | -0.74 | 0.952 | 48.8% | +32 | +21 | — | 44.6% | -0.39 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -1.04 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2112 | 156.0 | +6.66 | +1.24 | 1.267 | 54.0% | +18 | — | — | 71.7% | +1.61 | 9–1 (90%) | 3–5 (38%) | 103.1 | -0.43 | 2014 | 1580 | 124.5 | -1.78 | +0.96 | 0.993 | 49.7% | -22 | +78 | — | 47.2% | -0.02 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.6 | -0.24 |
| 23 | 2021 | 2040 | 154.1 | +6.00 | +1.08 | 1.240 | 54.0% | +82 | -235 | — | 72.2% | +1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.5 | -0.04 | 2015 | 1520 | 114.9 | -1.77 | -2.92 | 0.837 | 46.5% | -52 | +93 | +83 | 34.5% | -1.07 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–2 (60%) | 95.7 | -1.23 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1934 | 147.9 | +4.77 | +0.02 | 1.112 | 52.0% | +91 | -156 | — | 57.4% | +0.81 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–2 | — | -0.62 | 2016 | 1689 | 132.6 | +2.91 | +1.95 | 1.122 | 52.4% | -129 | +137 | -72 | 54.6% | +0.61 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.8 | -1.68 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1693 | 135.2 | +2.39 | +1.23 | 1.122 | 52.6% | -170 | +303 | -127 | 54.1% | +0.61 | 3–8 (27%) | 3–8 (27%) | 90.8 | +1.46 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1873 | 146.8 | +5.89 | -1.17 | 1.122 | 52.2% | +76 | -98 | -157 | 56.3% | +0.71 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.1 | -2.05 | 2018 | 1911 | 154.4 | +3.14 | +4.20 | 1.171 | 53.3% | -97 | +75 | -217 | 63.3% | +1.14 | 14–12 (54%) | 10–15 (40%) | 100.3 | -1.82 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1959 | 153.2 | +4.80 | +1.97 | 1.240 | 54.1% | +53 | -121 | -236 | 65.1% | +1.10 | 11–9 (55%) | 10–6 (63%) | 102.1 | +1.00 | 2019 | 1897 | 153.7 | +4.80 | +1.58 | 1.142 | 52.4% | -14 | +152 | -90 | 65.1% | +0.95 | 18–13 (58%) | 12–12 (50%) | 102.5 | +0.55 |
| 28 | 2026 | 2030 | 160.5 | +5.23 | +0.68 | 1.144 | 52.8% | -1 | -84 | -91 | 66.3% | +1.11 | 9–3 (75%) | 9–4 (69%) | 109.8 | -0.99 | 2020 | 1883 | 144.7 | +1.90 | +2.64 | 1.150 | 53.1% | +54 | +90 | — | 65.1% | +1.09 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–0 (100%) | 105.1 | +1.01 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1733 | 102.2 | -2.11 | -1.63 | 0.787 | 44.9% | +114 | +207 | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.66 |
| Career | — | 2179 | 158.0 | +4.73 | +0.79 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +34 | -153 | -148 | 62.7% | +0.95 | 71–38 (65%) | 50–46 (52%) | 107.7 | -1.65 | — | 2004 | 143.7 | +2.04 | +1.37 | 1.074 | 51.4% | -52 | +140 | -88 | 55.0% | +0.45 | 62–63 (50%) | 46–50 (48%) | 100.3 | -0.86 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 7 | 4 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Feb 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 25, 2018 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 5 | 3 | 8 | Sep 20, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 30, 2020 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 5 | 1 | 6 | May 25, 2017 | H2H |