H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 1-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2016 Tianjin second round 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #42 6-2 7-6(4) Lucie Hradecka #193 Match data Oct 14, 2016* R16 Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Lucie Hradecka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 — — — — — — —
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Lucie Hradecka
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Lucie Hradecka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Lucie Hradecka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.