H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 0-1
Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2017 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lucie Safarova | 6-2 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Lucie Safarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 |