H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Marketa Vondrousova H2H: 0-1
Marketa Vondrousova holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marketa Vondrousova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marketa Vondrousova won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2021* | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | R16 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-1 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,177 | 242 | 132 | 64.7% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Marketa Vondrousova | #137 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,050 | 169 | 107 | 61.2% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Marketa Vondrousova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,909 | 1 | 2 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,044 | 2 | 5 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,109 | 3 | 6 | 2021 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #35 | 1,900 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 20–8 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,038 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,902 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,932 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,969 | 1 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,903 | 1 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #57 | 1,873 | 4 | 7 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,988 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,967 | 4 | 8 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,974 | 1 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |