H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 1-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2016 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #101 6-3 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #52 Match data May 26, 2016* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 250 137 64.6% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 — — — — — — —
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 — — — — — — —
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 — — — — — — —
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,051 4 7 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 189 89 278 68.0% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 1960 153.1 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +52 -122 -247 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +0.96 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
28 2026 2051 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% -3 -102 -109 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.2 -0.78 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +34 -156 -154 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.2 -1.63 — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.