H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 2-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Sachia Vickery in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2018 Nottingham Open first round 3-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 29 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Sachia Vickery
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #18 3-6 6-1 6-2 Sachia Vickery #82 Match data Jun 14, 2018* R32 Nottingham Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Naomi Osaka #44 6-3 6-3 Sachia Vickery #100 Match data Mar 12, 2018* R32 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #18 #1 7,985 2,178 253 138 64.7% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Sachia Vickery — #73 833 1,699 38 57 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Sachia Vickery
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #199 1,502 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2014 2–5 28.6% #189 1,491 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2015 5–7 41.7% #129 1,503 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,046 2 5 2016 5–6 45.5% #138 1,520 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2017 5–5 50.0% #120 1,562 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,039 4 7 2018 9–11 45.0% #101 1,621 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2019 4–7 36.4% #157 1,566 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2020 1–1 50.0% #158 1,583 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2021 0–1 0.0% #221 1,507 0 0
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2022 0–1 0.0% #184 1,527 0 0
28 2026 30–12 71.4% #18 2,059 4 7 2023 4–6 40.0% #146 1,572 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2024 2–6 25.0% #201 1,575 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Sachia Vickery
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 8 5 13 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2026 15 7 22 68.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 192 90 282 68.1% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 25 33 58 43.1% 9 18 27 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 354/391 of Naomi Osaka's and 88/95 of Sachia Vickery's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Sachia Vickery
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2013 1/2 5.0 5.0 56.3% 62.5% 38.7% 20.0% 50.0% 52.1% 53.6%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2014 6/7 1.3 4.5 57.4% 57.3% 41.5% 53.8% 34.6% 50.3% 45.0%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2015 9/12 3.1 3.9 58.6% 59.7% 50.3% 54.5% 40.7% 55.7% 39.2%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2016 11/11 2.5 2.8 56.8% 59.9% 48.2% 58.0% 41.4% 54.8% 43.4%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2017 9/10 1.3 3.8 56.9% 60.6% 42.3% 53.5% 56.7% 52.9% 48.4%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2018 19/20 0.9 3.5 59.6% 58.7% 49.0% 59.5% 46.6% 54.5% 46.9%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2019 11/11 1.6 4.2 60.1% 59.9% 43.1% 45.5% 41.1% 53.0% 42.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 0.5 3.0 65.9% 64.7% 52.4% 32.5% 45.2% 60.5% 46.2%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2021 1/1 0.0 9.0 46.8% 37.9% 39.4% 50.0% 40.0% 38.7% 48.5%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2022 1/1 1.0 2.0 59.2% 44.8% 40.0% 25.0% 28.6% 42.9% 41.7%
28 2026 41/43 5.9 2.4 58.5% 72.9% 49.5% 54.5% 47.6% 63.2% 42.4% 2023 10/10 3.1 2.9 60.3% 64.3% 44.9% 44.2% 42.5% 56.5% 44.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 1.4 3.3 53.6% 63.1% 39.5% 45.4% 39.1% 52.4% 43.3%
Career — 354/393 5.8 2.4 57.0% 72.6% 48.9% 54.8% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 88/95 1.8 3.6 58.3% 60.0% 45.5% 51.5% 43.5% 53.9% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Sachia Vickery
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.6 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2013 1503 98.8 -1.35 +1.19 1.120 52.9% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -46 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2014 1491 100.7 -2.15 +0.87 0.905 47.8% +16 — — 26.7% -1.07 1–0 0–1 — +0.40
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2015 1503 98.8 -2.03 -1.64 0.887 47.7% -16 +31 +124 39.3% -1.21 3–1 (75%) 5–0 (100%) 107.1 +0.37
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.63 2016 1521 102.6 -1.47 -1.18 0.962 49.1% -24 +17 — 46.2% -0.19 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 101.7 +0.96
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +18 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.43 2017 1562 106.0 -1.43 +0.91 1.027 50.6% -33 — — 52.4% +0.24 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.15
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2018 1621 129.2 -0.64 +3.43 1.031 50.8% +41 -118 -7 51.1% +0.09 1–6 (14%) — — -0.78
24 2022 1934 147.9 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2019 1566 112.8 -2.90 -1.45 0.907 47.4% +18 — — 36.0% -1.24 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.70
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1584 109.3 +1.68 +1.36 1.170 53.4% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.06
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2021 1508 88.2 +1.80 -2.47 0.792 43.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
27 2025 1959 153.2 +4.80 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +53 -121 -236 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +1.00 2022 1527 106.2 -0.05 +2.53 0.729 42.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.20
28 2026 2059 160.0 +5.34 +0.83 1.153 53.0% +2 -112 -119 67.0% +1.13 9–3 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 109.8 -1.11 2023 1572 113.5 -0.99 +0.54 1.011 50.0% +5 — — 38.1% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.47
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1575 116.9 -1.95 -0.82 0.910 47.9% -15 +35 — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — -0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1547 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1507 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2179 157.2 +4.74 +0.81 1.143 52.6% +34 -158 -154 62.8% +0.95 71–38 (65%) 50–46 (52%) 107.7 -1.69 — 1699 114.2 -1.43 +0.43 0.965 49.2% +6 +2 +59 42.1% -0.57 12–16 (43%) 14–5 (74%) 105.0 +4.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.