H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 2-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Sachia Vickery in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2018 Nottingham third round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2018* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Naomi Osaka | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-3 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |