H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Sara Errani H2H: 3-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 3–0 lead over Sara Errani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 Italian Open first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #48 6-2 6-3 Sara Errani #177 Match data May 7, 2025 R128 Italian Open WTA 1000 Clay
Naomi Osaka #287 6-3 6-1 Sara Errani #100 Match data Mar 8, 2024* R128 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #104 6-1 6-3 Sara Errani #18 Match data Mar 25, 2016* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Sara Errani
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Sara Errani
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 593/692 of Sara Errani's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Sara Errani
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Sara Errani
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.