H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 2-1
Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2022 Madrid third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-3 6-1 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| May 7, 2019* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Naomi Osaka | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-0 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 7-6(3) | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |