H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Sloane Stephens H2H: 1-2
Sloane Stephens holds a 2–1 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sloane Stephens leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2022 Indian Wells first round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2018 | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2016* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sloane Stephens | 6-3 7-5 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Sloane Stephens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 |