H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Tatjana Maria H2H: 1-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 1–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2019 Canadian Open second round 6-2 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #2 6-2 0-0 (ret.) Tatjana Maria #74 Match data Aug 8, 2019* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Tatjana Maria #116 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Naomi Osaka #47 Match data Sep 30, 2016 Q1 Q China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #144 7-5 6-7(6) 6-3 Tatjana Maria #74 Match data Jan 8, 2016 Q1 Q Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Tatjana Maria
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Tatjana Maria
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7%
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Tatjana Maria
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 41/43 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 320/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Tatjana Maria
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1638 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.73
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -226 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -35 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.