H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-1

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2017 Hong Kong fourth round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
JPN Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2017* Hong Kong WTA 250 R16 Hard Naomi Osaka #64 7-5 6-2 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Jul 9, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Venus Williams #11 7-6(3) 6-4 Naomi Osaka #59 Match data
Jan 5, 2017* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Naomi Osaka #48 (w/o) Venus Williams #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,140 240 130 64.9% 4 2 0 0 2 8
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,531 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,509 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,697 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2018 39–19 67.2% #5 1,904 1 2 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,030 2 5 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,082 3 6 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2021 18–7 72.0% #13 2,002 4 7 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,894 4 7 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 — — — — — — — 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2024 21–16 56.8% #57 1,883 4 7 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,968 4 8 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2026 19–8 70.4% #13 2,044 4 8 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47