H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-1 (incl. walkovers)

Naomi Osaka vs Venus Williams: 1–1 excluding walkovers; 2–1 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2017 Hong Kong Open second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 1
3 main-draw results
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #64 7-5 6-2 Venus Williams #5 Match data Oct 13, 2017* R16 Hong Kong Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Venus Williams #11 7-6(3) 6-4 Naomi Osaka #59 Match data Jul 9, 2017* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Naomi Osaka #48 (w/o) Venus Williams #17 Match data Jan 5, 2017* R16 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 0 2 0 1 1 8
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 — — — — — — — 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 — — — — — — — 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — — — — — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.