H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 1-1
Natalia Vikhlyantseva and Ana Konjuh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on grass, while Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2017 Stanford fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 7-5 6-4 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2017* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-3 7-5 | Ana Konjuh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |