H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-4
Julia Goerges holds a 4–0 lead over Natalia Vikhlyantseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2019 US Open first round 1-6 6-1 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 1-6 6-1 7-6(1) | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2018* | Moscow River Cup | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-2 7-6(2) | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-1 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2017 | Moscow | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |