H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Tauziat vs Elise Burgin H2H: 3-0
Nathalie Tauziat holds a 3–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1989 Los Angeles second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Nathalie Tauziat | 6-2 6-2 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1987* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Tauziat | 6-0 6-3 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1987* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Nathalie Tauziat | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Tauziat | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |