H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:30 UTC
Nina Stojanovic vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 0-1
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Stojanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2021 Lyon fourth round 2-6 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021* | Lyon | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 2-6 6-1 7-6(5) | Nina Stojanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Stojanovic | #493 | #81 | 983 | 1,686 | 24 | 37 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Stojanovic | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #248 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #250 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |