Nina Stojanovic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 26, 2021 | H2H |
| Rebecca Peterson | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 19, 2021 | H2H |
| Heather Watson | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 4, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nina Stojanovic vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 0-1
Kiki Bertens holds a 1–0 lead over Nina Stojanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2017 Bogotá Open first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | 6-4 6-1 | Nina Stojanovic | Match data | Apr 12, 2017* | R32 | Bogotá Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Stojanovic | #493 | #81 | 983 | 1,675 | 24 | 38 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,004 | 216 | 172 | 55.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Stojanovic | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #248 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #87 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #116 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #22 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #250 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 57–26 | 68.7% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #25 | 1,733 | 0 | 11 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nina Stojanovic | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 22 | 2019 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26 | 15 | 41 | 63.4% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30 | 18 | 48 | 62.5% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 17 | 25 | 42 | 40.5% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 98 | 107 | 205 | 47.8% | 95 | 45 | 140 | 67.9% | 20 | 19 | 39 | 51.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 58/62 of Nina Stojanovic's and 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Nina Stojanovic | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2016 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 63.5% | 55.0% | 34.8% | 37.5% | 33.3% | 47.6% | 39.4% | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 53.7% | 61.1% | 32.3% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 47.8% | 40.9% |
| 20 | 2017 | 7/7 | 2.7 | 5.4 | 53.4% | 62.5% | 41.9% | 60.6% | 29.1% | 53.0% | 35.8% | 2012 | 23/23 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 60.5% | 65.3% | 41.1% | 49.3% | 48.2% | 55.7% | 42.3% |
| 21 | 2018 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 70.5% | 67.7% | 42.3% | 57.1% | 25.0% | 60.2% | 37.9% | 2013 | 30/33 | 2.2 | 5.5 | 57.6% | 61.8% | 42.9% | 51.9% | 45.5% | 54.1% | 43.7% |
| 22 | 2019 | 14/14 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 56.2% | 64.5% | 46.6% | 47.5% | 49.7% | 56.7% | 45.9% | 2014 | 22/25 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 60.8% | 44.5% | 49.6% | 41.8% | 53.8% | 45.8% |
| 23 | 2020 | 6/6 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 54.9% | 62.2% | 44.4% | 31.0% | 51.9% | 54.6% | 36.7% | 2015 | 19/24 | 1.9 | 5.1 | 63.9% | 59.1% | 51.6% | 53.8% | 57.3% | 56.1% | 36.8% |
| 24 | 2021 | 23/26 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.0% | 64.2% | 46.9% | 56.6% | 48.3% | 56.6% | 41.0% | 2016 | 45/46 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 67.4% | 47.6% | 55.6% | 44.9% | 59.0% | 46.0% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 54/56 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 55.5% | 71.4% | 43.7% | 54.1% | 50.0% | 59.1% | 45.9% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 64/69 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 58.0% | 69.1% | 47.9% | 51.8% | 51.7% | 60.0% | 46.8% |
| 27 | 2024 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 60.4% | 59.7% | 49.0% | 34.3% | 49.3% | 55.1% | 52.1% | 2019 | 76/83 | 5.6 | 4.4 | 57.1% | 72.6% | 47.2% | 58.5% | 48.8% | 61.8% | 43.6% |
| 28 | 2025 | 3/4 | 2.0 | 5.7 | 58.2% | 59.2% | 41.9% | 43.6% | 34.1% | 52.1% | 37.2% | 2020 | 19/19 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 63.7% | 68.3% | 43.5% | 59.6% | 57.0% | 59.1% | 47.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8/9 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 64.5% | 58.8% | 40.4% | 44.2% | 43.1% | 51.9% | 37.9% |
| Career | — | 58/62 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 56.7% | 63.3% | 45.5% | 50.1% | 45.4% | 55.6% | 41.4% | — | 361/388 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 58.6% | 67.8% | 45.8% | 54.1% | 49.0% | 58.5% | 44.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nina Stojanovic | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2016 | 1515 | 99.1 | -4.07 | -1.08 | 0.753 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.02 | 2011 | 1494 | 97.6 | +1.77 | -1.03 | 0.783 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 20 | 2017 | 1491 | 101.3 | -1.38 | -2.27 | 0.761 | 44.2% | +46 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.47 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.15 | 2012 | 1580 | 118.0 | +0.05 | -1.16 | 0.955 | 49.1% | -24 | +11 | +4 | 47.1% | -0.27 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.6 | -0.87 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1494 | 102.1 | -1.39 | -1.07 | 0.952 | 48.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | 2013 | 1551 | 121.8 | -1.34 | -0.74 | 0.952 | 48.8% | +33 | +22 | — | 44.6% | -0.39 | 5–7 (42%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -1.04 |
| 22 | 2019 | 1630 | 119.3 | -0.09 | +1.08 | 1.061 | 51.2% | -42 | +15 | — | 57.1% | +0.29 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–3 (50%) | 104.9 | -0.08 | 2014 | 1580 | 124.4 | -1.78 | +0.96 | 0.993 | 49.7% | -23 | +77 | — | 47.2% | -0.02 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.6 | -0.24 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1530 | 104.0 | -1.97 | -2.04 | 0.807 | 45.1% | -19 | — | — | 7.7% | -2.15 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.45 | 2015 | 1520 | 114.8 | -1.77 | -2.92 | 0.837 | 46.5% | -52 | +93 | +82 | 34.5% | -1.07 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–2 (60%) | 95.7 | -1.23 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1618 | 126.8 | -0.37 | -1.26 | 0.944 | 49.2% | -13 | -31 | +45 | 48.3% | -0.26 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.1 | -0.02 | 2016 | 1689 | 132.6 | +2.91 | +1.95 | 1.122 | 52.4% | -129 | +137 | -72 | 54.6% | +0.61 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.8 | -1.68 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1603 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1696 | 135.9 | +2.41 | +1.24 | 1.122 | 52.6% | -173 | +308 | -130 | 54.9% | +0.68 | 3–8 (27%) | 3–8 (27%) | 90.8 | +1.57 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1911 | 154.4 | +3.14 | +4.20 | 1.171 | 53.3% | -97 | +80 | -217 | 63.3% | +1.14 | 14–12 (54%) | 10–15 (40%) | 100.3 | -1.83 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1640 | 110.8 | -0.85 | +0.09 | 1.160 | 53.6% | -42 | — | — | 71.4% | +1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 2019 | 1897 | 153.7 | +4.80 | +1.58 | 1.142 | 52.4% | -14 | +155 | -90 | 65.1% | +0.95 | 18–13 (58%) | 12–12 (50%) | 102.5 | +0.54 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1601 | 101.2 | -1.30 | -0.52 | 0.776 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 12.5% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | 2020 | 1883 | 144.7 | +1.90 | +2.64 | 1.150 | 53.1% | +54 | +91 | — | 65.1% | +1.09 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–0 (100%) | 105.1 | +1.01 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1733 | 102.2 | -2.11 | -1.63 | 0.787 | 44.9% | +114 | +208 | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.66 |
| Career | — | 1675 | 116.2 | -0.74 | -0.78 | 0.932 | 48.5% | -14 | 0 | +45 | 42.3% | -0.56 | 9–12 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.6 | +1.69 | — | 2004 | 143.8 | +2.04 | +1.38 | 1.074 | 51.4% | -53 | +144 | -88 | 55.1% | +0.46 | 62–63 (50%) | 46–50 (48%) | 100.2 | -0.84 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kiki Bertens
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 25, 2018 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 5 | 3 | 8 | Sep 20, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 30, 2020 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 5 | 1 | 6 | May 26, 2017 | H2H |