H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 0-1
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Parrizas Diaz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2023 Merida fourth round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023* | Merida | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |