H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 3-0
Ons Jabeur holds a 3–0 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2022 Miami third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
EST
Age 41
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 6-3 6-0 | Kaia Kanepi | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-6(8) 6-0 | Kaia Kanepi | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 6-2 | Kaia Kanepi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Kaia Kanepi | #1,322 | #15 | 2,760 | 1,912 | 261 | 235 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Kaia Kanepi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #285 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #98 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #75 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #34 | 1,816 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 25–9 | 73.5% | #19 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 21–10 | 67.7% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,655 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #73 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #32 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #168 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |