H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ons Jabeur vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-0

Ons Jabeur holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ons Jabeur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2022 US Open first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ons Jabeur
Tunisia Age 32 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ons Jabeur #5 7-5 6-2 Madison Brengle #61 Match data Aug 31, 2022* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ons Jabeur #81 7-6(5) 6-2 Madison Brengle #93 Match data Jan 12, 2020 Q2 Q Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ons Jabeur #439 #2 5,210 2,106 221 154 58.9% 0 1 0 2 2 5
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ons Jabeur Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2012 0–2 0.0% #260 1,486 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 2013 3–3 50.0% #137 1,505 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 2014 2–7 22.2% #143 1,467 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2015 1–5 16.7% #220 1,455 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2016 0–3 0.0% #196 1,440 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2017 9–11 45.0% #88 1,588 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2018 9–12 42.9% #60 1,734 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2019 15–19 44.1% #76 1,711 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2020 21–11 65.6% #31 1,862 0 0 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2021 48–19 71.6% #10 1,969 0 1 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2022 47–17 73.4% #2 2,006 0 3 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2023 36–18 66.7% #6 1,970 0 5 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2024 16–15 51.6% #42 1,883 0 5 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2025 14–12 53.8% #75 1,829 0 5 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ons Jabeur Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2015 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2018 6 9 15 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2019 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2020 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2021 25 13 38 65.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2022 19 12 31 61.3% 17 4 21 81.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2023 18 12 30 60.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2025 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 120 105 225 53.3% 59 30 89 66.3% 42 19 61 68.9% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 347/376 of Ons Jabeur's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ons Jabeur Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2012 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.6% 68.0% 45.0% 55.6% 42.9% 57.8% 37.5% 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 2013 6/6 1.5 3.0 53.1% 64.9% 50.1% 36.5% 62.1% 58.1% 50.5% 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 2014 8/9 1.5 4.1 53.6% 62.3% 45.0% 43.1% 39.9% 54.2% 44.9% 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2015 4/6 2.0 2.8 45.6% 64.9% 40.9% 41.5% 43.8% 52.3% 37.0% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2016 2/3 4.0 2.0 59.0% 48.3% 43.0% 47.4% 69.2% 46.0% 27.5% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2017 20/20 3.8 3.1 50.0% 65.2% 48.3% 62.4% 37.6% 56.8% 42.1% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2018 20/21 3.5 3.0 51.6% 64.6% 46.6% 55.6% 54.0% 55.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2019 33/34 4.3 3.0 54.7% 64.4% 44.6% 51.6% 51.8% 55.4% 41.5% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2020 32/32 3.9 3.3 52.1% 68.5% 50.5% 51.1% 48.5% 59.8% 44.5% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2021 65/67 4.2 2.5 54.3% 71.6% 49.6% 62.7% 48.4% 61.6% 46.7% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2022 64/64 3.5 2.2 56.5% 69.2% 49.0% 53.2% 53.1% 60.4% 46.2% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2023 53/54 3.4 3.0 54.7% 67.7% 45.9% 52.3% 51.3% 57.5% 46.7% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2024 30/31 4.0 1.9 57.4% 70.7% 49.6% 53.5% 42.6% 61.4% 41.7% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2025 9/27 2.6 2.7 56.2% 62.9% 46.0% 49.1% 38.8% 55.2% 37.8% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 347/376 3.7 2.7 54.4% 68.0% 47.9% 54.4% 49.1% 58.8% 44.5% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ons Jabeur Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2012 1487 105.5 -1.07 -1.48 0.888 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — 0.00 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 2013 1505 112.0 +0.34 +1.50 1.206 54.1% +22 — — 66.7% +1.25 0–2 — — +0.49 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 2014 1467 107.4 -1.06 +0.45 0.980 49.3% +20 +73 — 36.4% -0.77 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.09 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2015 1456 113.6 -0.27 -2.59 0.775 44.6% +16 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.32 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2016 1441 102.1 -0.75 -4.05 0.508 38.0% — — — 25.0% -1.75 0–2 0–2 — +0.03 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2017 1588 123.8 +0.47 -0.03 0.973 49.5% -27 -27 — 47.8% -0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.03 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2018 1734 134.6 +0.39 -0.19 0.977 49.4% -26 -155 — 45.7% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2019 1711 130.6 -1.19 -0.06 0.930 48.5% -31 — +9 47.9% -0.34 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) 106.2 -0.87 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2020 1862 150.9 +2.75 +2.22 1.107 51.8% 0 -258 — 61.0% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 6–6 (50%) 105.8 -0.70 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2021 1970 155.8 +4.76 +3.62 1.217 53.9% -17 -155 -24 65.8% +1.26 15–6 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 108.6 +0.57 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2022 2006 157.3 +3.78 +4.23 1.167 53.3% -60 +33 +127 68.9% +1.17 16–8 (67%) 10–6 (63%) 105.1 -2.17 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2023 1971 148.1 +1.74 +3.95 1.099 51.9% -48 +96 +166 62.1% +0.73 12–4 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 104.3 -0.38 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2024 1883 132.4 +3.87 -0.52 1.080 51.2% -76 +115 +257 55.1% +0.30 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 93.8 +0.39 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2025 1829 141.3 -0.24 -2.63 0.843 46.3% +43 +64 +247 55.4% +0.27 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 97.0 +0.01 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2106 149.2 +2.34 +2.11 1.080 51.5% -22 -9 +112 58.1% +0.55 68–56 (55%) 52–49 (51%) 102.1 -1.02 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.