H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Misaki Doi H2H: 0-1
Misaki Doi holds a 1–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Misaki Doi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Misaki Doi won the 2019 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Misaki Doi | 6-3 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Misaki Doi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |