H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Casale vs Dana Gilbert H2H: 1-0

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Dana Gilbert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1981 Tokyo Borden quarterfinal 5-7 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale 5-7 6-2 6-1 Dana Gilbert Match data Oct 17, 1981* QF Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dana Gilbert 1,711 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Casale Dana Gilbert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 15–10 60.0% 1,597 0 0
17 1981 30–17 63.8% 1,810 0 0 1977 1–1 50.0% 1,509 0 0
18 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,745 0 0 1978 8–5 61.5% 1,615 0 1
19 1983 23–20 53.5% 1,770 0 0 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,555 0 1
20 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0 1980 14–12 53.8% 1,664 0 2
21 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0 1981 6–12 33.3% 1,612 0 2
22 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0 1982 20–15 57.1% 1,663 0 2
23 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0 1983 9–21 30.0% 1,539 0 2
24 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Casale Dana Gilbert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 8 7 15 53.3%
17 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7%
24 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7% 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Casale Dana Gilbert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1598 118.7 +29 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +2.02
17 1981 1811 140.3 -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97 1977 1509 98.0 40.0% -1.00 1–0 +0.42
18 1982 1745 140.3 -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37 1978 1616 120.2 -30 +61 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.71
19 1983 1770 144.1 -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57 1979 1556 109.9 -25 +140 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +0.65
20 1984 1914 155.3 +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46 1980 1665 123.9 -113 +95 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +1.01
21 1985 1814 137.6 +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08 1981 1612 104.5 -26 +81 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +0.39
22 1986 1788 137.1 -56 +52 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63 1982 1664 118.1 -84 +47 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.19
23 1987 1673 114.3 -20 -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) -0.50 1983 1540 100.8 +29 +72 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) +1.52
24 1988 1552 100.5 +25 +207 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1989 1547 93.6 0.0% -5.50 -0.21
26 1990 1526 90.6 0.0% -5.00 +0.21
Career 1944 143.5 +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42 1712 115.9 -43 +71 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.