H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-0

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1980 Montreal round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Adriana Villagran Reami
ARG

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-3 Adriana Villagran Reami Match data Jul 17, 1980* R32 Montreal WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Adriana Villagran Reami — — — 1,597 66 119 35.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Pam Shriver Adriana Villagran Reami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,470 0 0
1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,469 0 0
1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1979 3–2 60.0% — 1,513 0 0
1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,530 0 0
1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1981 0–3 0.0% — 1,508 0 0
1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1984 10–11 47.6% — 1,517 0 0
1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1985 12–18 40.0% — 1,559 0 0
1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1986 13–25 34.2% — 1,506 0 0
1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1987 13–21 38.2% — 1,528 0 0
1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1988 11–18 37.9% — 1,521 0 0
1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1989 2–12 14.3% — 1,445 0 0
1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,432 0 0
1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Pam Shriver Adriana Villagran Reami
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1975 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1979 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1984 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1985 3 7 10 30.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1986 2 10 12 16.7% 4 8 12 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% Career 15 40 55 27.3% 36 58 94 38.3% 7 14 21 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Pam Shriver Adriana Villagran Reami
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 1972 1499 106.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1973 1482 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.27
1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1974 1470 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.09
1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1975 1470 99.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.61
1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1979 1513 110.9 — — — — — +51 — 63.6% +1.54 0–1 0–1 — +0.73
1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1980 1530 119.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.76
1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1981 1509 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.18
1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1982 1493 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.15
1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1984 1517 106.3 — — — — +83 +60 +15 48.0% -0.04 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — +3.12
1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1985 1559 105.9 — — — — +23 -3 -52 43.1% -0.86 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) 101.4 +1.70
1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1986 1507 106.7 — — — — +11 +29 +29 37.6% -0.92 3–6 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 101.0 +4.51
1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1987 1528 107.0 — — — — -24 +23 — 38.5% -1.30 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 105.1 +1.50
1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1988 1522 105.6 — — — — -78 +40 — 39.7% -0.81 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 +0.87
1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1989 1446 94.3 — — — — -51 +60 — 22.6% -2.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.47
1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1990 1432 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12
1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 Career 1597 107.0 — — — — +10 +32 -7 38.7% -0.99 23–30 (43%) 22–15 (59%) 103.2 +7.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.