H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 5-0

Pam Shriver holds a 5–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1987 Brisbane International round of 32 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #5 7-6 7-6 Anne Hobbs #99 Match data Jan 1, 1987* R32 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Pam Shriver #3 6-2 6-3 Anne Hobbs Match data Sep 2, 1985* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Pam Shriver #5 6-3 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data Jun 28, 1985* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-0 Anne Hobbs Match data Jun 15, 1985* QF Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver 6-4 6-1 Anne Hobbs Match data Jan 4, 1982 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Anne Hobbs #583 #35 18 1,838 171 163 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,575 0 2
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1980 26–18 59.1% — 1,752 0 5
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,824 0 5
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,750 0 7
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,735 0 7
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1985 13–12 52.0% #63 1,777 0 8
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,679 0 8
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 — — — — — — —
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Anne Hobbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 28 41 69 40.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Anne Hobbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.73
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 1977 1576 107.0 — — — — +110 -77 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.78
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1978 1721 124.8 — — — — -11 — -74 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.66
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1979 1750 138.1 — — — — -72 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.77
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1980 1753 133.2 — — — — -138 -53 -44 57.4% +0.63 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 99.6 -0.64
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1981 1824 132.2 — — — — -130 -98 -23 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.46
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1982 1727 117.1 — — — — -111 -94 +66 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.55
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1983 1751 128.8 — — — — -65 -56 +26 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.51
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1984 1736 125.9 — — — — -108 -51 +108 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.66
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1985 1777 133.9 — — — — -156 — +124 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -135 -60 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.37
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 1987 1714 125.8 — — — — -121 — +119 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.62
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 1989 1610 99.4 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.08
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1839 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 62–54 (53%) 27–30 (47%) 100.0 +1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.