H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pam Shriver vs Anne White H2H: 7-0

Pam Shriver holds a 7–0 lead over Anne White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–0 on grass and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1986 Newport semifinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main-draw meetings
Anne White
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #6 6-1 6-3 Anne White #22 Match data Jul 19, 1986* SF Newport WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 6-3 6-2 Anne White Match data Sep 28, 1985* SF New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #5 6-3 6-7 6-3 Anne White Match data Jun 26, 1985* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #4 7-6 6-3 Anne White #37 Match data Jun 17, 1984* F Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-4 Anne White Match data Jan 13, 1983* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-2 6-1 Anne White Match data Oct 17, 1981* QF Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver 7-5 7-5 Anne White Match data Oct 9, 1980* R32 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24
Anne White #262 #19 20 1,846 110 118 48.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Shriver Anne White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1 1978 2–1 66.7% — 1,531 0 0
17 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4 1980 8–9 47.1% — 1,597 0 0
19 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5 1981 14–16 46.7% — 1,685 0 0
20 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8 1982 12–16 42.9% — 1,685 0 0
21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10 1983 25–19 56.8% — 1,753 0 0
22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14 1984 18–18 50.0% #45 1,753 0 0
23 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16 1985 12–11 52.2% #44 1,801 0 0
24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20 1986 9–16 36.0% #51 1,704 0 0
25 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24 1987 9–10 47.4% #57 1,664 0 1
26 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24 — — — — — — —
27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24 — — — — — — —
28 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24 1990 1–2 33.3% — 1,659 0 1
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24 — — — — — — —
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24 — — — — — — —
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24 — — — — — — —
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24 — — — — — — —
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24 — — — — — — —
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Shriver Anne White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1978 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5% 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7% 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0% 1983 11 4 15 73.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6% 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
23 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3% 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2% 1987 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2% — 41 37 78 52.6% 20 21 41 48.8% 32 29 61 52.5% 16 29 45 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Shriver Anne White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83 1978 1531 107.1 — — — — +106 — — 66.7% +1.67 — 1–0 — +0.53
17 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74 1980 1598 123.8 — — — — +3 -9 — 48.8% -0.24 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.16
19 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82 1981 1686 131.1 — — — — +9 -12 -97 45.1% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 0–2 — -1.18
20 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79 1982 1686 128.5 — — — — -9 -60 -23 41.3% -0.63 5–4 (56%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.87
21 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74 1983 1754 133.6 — — — — -45 -69 +24 54.5% +0.26 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 106.4 +0.48
22 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23 1984 1753 134.8 — — — — -56 -30 +61 50.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -0.30
23 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63 1985 1802 136.9 — — — — -6 -89 -34 51.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 -0.36
24 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44 1986 1704 130.7 — — — — +38 -58 +59 37.7% -0.83 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 97.0 -1.10
25 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71 1987 1665 120.7 — — — — +32 — +98 47.6% -0.02 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.77
26 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30 1990 1660 111.9 — — — — +10 — — 33.3% -2.17 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
29 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47 — 1846 137.9 — — — — -5 -42 +12 47.6% -0.23 30–28 (52%) 19–26 (42%) 99.8 -1.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.