H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patricia Mayr-Achleitner vs Teliana Pereira H2H: 0-2
Teliana Pereira holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Mayr-Achleitner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Teliana Pereira leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Teliana Pereira won the 2014 Charleston second round 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 39
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 37
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2014* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Teliana Pereira | 6-1 7-6(5) | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Teliana Pereira | 6-2 7-6(5) | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | #558 | #70 | 877 | 1,600 | 47 | 77 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teliana Pereira | #1,102 | #43 | 1,136 | 1,643 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Mayr-Achleitner | Teliana Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #112 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #91 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #99 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #206 | 1,478 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #558 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 |