H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 3-0
Paula Badosa holds a 3–0 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paula Badosa leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2022 Sydney final 6-3 4-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-1 7-5 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| May 1, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 6-1 7-5 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 171 | 112 | 60.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 166 | 101 | 62.2% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,876 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #32 | 1,933 | 2 | 8 |