H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 3-1
Paula Badosa holds a 3–1 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paula Badosa leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2023 Rome second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 6-1 6-4 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2022* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Paula Badosa | 7-6(9) 1-6 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-3 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2021* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-6(6) 5-7 7-5 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |