H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Patricia Maria Tig H2H: 1-0
Paula Badosa holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2019 Seoul fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2019* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-4 6-2 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Patricia Maria Tig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |