H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 2-1
Paula Badosa holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on clay, while Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2022 Indian Wells third round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Sep 11, 2020* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 6-1 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2016* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-3 7-5 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |