H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Varvara Gracheva H2H: 2-2
Paula Badosa and Varvara Gracheva are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Varvara Gracheva leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2021 Ostrava third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 25
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2021* | Ostrava | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-2 6-2 | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Varvara Gracheva | 6-4 6-4 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Varvara Gracheva | 6-4 7-5 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Varvara Gracheva | #95 | #39 | 1,290 | 1,833 | 85 | 117 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Varvara Gracheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #66 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #95 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |