H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Paula Smith vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-1

Pam Casale holds a 1–0 lead over Paula Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1980 Tampa round of 32 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 69 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale 6-3 6-2 Paula Smith Match data Nov 13, 1980* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paula Smith #393 #194 1 1,631 59 116 33.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paula Smith Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 15–10 60.0% 1,597 0 0
17 1974 0–2 0.0% 1,483 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% 1,810 0 0
18 1982 20–23 46.5% 1,745 0 0
19 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,463 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% 1,770 0 0
20 1977 3–4 42.9% 1,472 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1978 3–9 25.0% 1,453 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1979 4–6 40.0% 1,513 0 1 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1980 13–22 37.1% 1,576 0 1 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1981 9–18 33.3% 1,515 0 1 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1982 6–15 28.6% 1,504 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1983 11–15 42.3% 1,590 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1984 8–13 38.1% 1,541 0 1
28 1985 1–1 50.0% 1,553 0 1
29 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,541 0 1
30 1987 1–4 20.0% #199 1,492 0 1
31 1988 0–4 0.0% #351 1,443 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paula Smith Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1980 8 7 15 53.3%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1983 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1985 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1988 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 15 36 51 29.4% 26 32 58 44.8% 6 26 32 18.8% 6 18 24 25.0% 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paula Smith Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1598 118.7 +29 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 +2.02
17 1974 1483 97.2 0.0% -2.50 +0.19 1981 1811 140.3 -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1982 1745 140.3 -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1976 1463 96.0 0.0% -3.50 +0.20 1983 1770 144.1 -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1977 1473 108.3 50.0% +0.50 0–2 +0.67 1984 1914 155.3 +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1978 1454 103.3 +31 +87 +75 32.1% -0.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) +0.90 1985 1814 137.6 +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1979 1513 125.1 38.1% -0.90 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.67 1986 1788 137.1 -56 +52 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1980 1576 117.5 -113 -9 -44 38.2% -0.84 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 +0.39 1987 1673 114.3 -20 -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) -0.50
24 1981 1516 113.0 +52 +48 -54 39.1% -0.53 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 96.3 +2.31 1988 1552 100.5 +25 +207 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1982 1505 119.6 -32 +90 -41 32.6% -1.06 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 96.1 -0.87 1989 1547 93.6 0.0% -5.50 -0.21
26 1983 1591 111.2 -51 +63 -106 39.3% -1.10 7–4 (64%) 2–0 +0.18 1990 1526 90.6 0.0% -5.00 +0.21
27 1984 1542 104.1 -19 +90 -68 44.9% -0.61 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +2.63
28 1985 1553 105.5 50.0% -0.50 +0.02
29 1986 1541 94.8 0.0% -5.50 +0.06
30 1987 1492 91.9 -12 27.3% -2.09 0–1 1–0 +0.84
31 1988 1443 86.9 -32 11.1% -3.78 0–1 +0.04
Career 1631 114.3 -39 +58 -52 37.2% -0.94 17–34 (33%) 10–18 (36%) 90.4 +3.96 1944 143.5 +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.