H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pauline Parmentier vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-1
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2008 Australian Open second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 7-5 6-4 | Pauline Parmentier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pauline Parmentier | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |