H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 0-2

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 2–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2016 Tianjin third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
FRA Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2016* Tianjin WTA 250 R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 6-1 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #67 Match data
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 6-1 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,702 121 188 39.2% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,507 0 0 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2008 17–20 45.9% #61 1,585 0 2 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,536 0 2 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,444 0 2 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,441 0 2 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,465 0 2 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,523 0 2 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,460 0 2 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,580 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,656 0 2 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,682 0 4 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2019 12–23 34.3% #123 1,598 0 4 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,544 0 4 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 — — — — — — — 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18