H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Petra Kvitova vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 5-1

Petra Kvitova holds a 5–1 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2013 Madrid third round 2-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #71 2-6 6-2 6-3 Petra Kvitova #8 Match data
Feb 21, 2013* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Petra Kvitova #8 6-2 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #67 Match data
Oct 3, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Petra Kvitova #5 6-2 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #34 Match data
Jan 14, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #2 6-0 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #21 Match data
Oct 15, 2011* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #4 6-2 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data
Jun 18, 2011* Eastbourne WTA 500 SF Grass Petra Kvitova #8 7-6(9) 4-2 (ret.) Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Kvitova Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7
35 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31 — — — — — — —