H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC

Petra Kvitova vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 3-2

Petra Kvitova holds a 3–2 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2010 Beijing third round 7-5 6-7(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 2010* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Petra Kvitova #34 7-5 6-7(6) 6-2 Kaia Kanepi #23 Match data
Jul 1, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Petra Kvitova #62 4-6 7-6(8) 8-6 Kaia Kanepi #80 Match data
Feb 20, 2010* Memphis WTA 250 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #66 1-6 6-3 7-6(0) Kaia Kanepi #62 Match data
Jun 2, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Kaia Kanepi #49 6-3 3-6 6-1 Petra Kvitova #87 Match data
Mar 25, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Kaia Kanepi #61 3-6 7-5 7-5 Petra Kvitova #132 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Kvitova Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4