H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Petra Kvitova vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 4-0
Petra Kvitova holds a 4–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 36
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
| May 29, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 6-4 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Petra Kvitova | 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
| May 9, 2012* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Petra Kvitova | 6-2 6-3 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Kvitova | #450 | #2 | 7,690 | 2,073 | 501 | 258 | 66.0% | 2 | 10 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 31 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Kvitova | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #50 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #34 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 50–11 | 82.0% | #2 | 2,058 | 1 | 7 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,961 | 1 | 9 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #6 | 1,966 | 1 | 11 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #4 | 1,989 | 2 | 14 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #6 | 1,907 | 2 | 17 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,966 | 2 | 19 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #29 | 1,894 | 2 | 20 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 2 | 25 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #7 | 1,897 | 2 | 27 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 20–7 | 74.1% | #8 | 1,947 | 2 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #17 | 1,881 | 2 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #16 | 1,920 | 2 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #14 | 1,931 | 2 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,773 | 2 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |