H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Petra Kvitova vs Na Li H2H: 3-4

Na Li holds a 4–3 lead over Petra Kvitova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 WTA Championships semifinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 28, 2013* WTA Championships WTA Finals SF Hard Na Li #3 6-4 6-2 Petra Kvitova #6 Match data
Oct 5, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #7 4-6 6-2 6-4 Na Li #5 Match data
Apr 27, 2013* Stuttgart WTA 500 QF Clay Na Li #5 6-3 7-5 Petra Kvitova #8 Match data
Aug 12, 2012* Montreal WTA 1000 F Hard Petra Kvitova #6 7-5 2-6 6-3 Na Li #11 Match data
Jan 14, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Na Li #5 1-6 7-5 6-2 Petra Kvitova #2 Match data
May 30, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Na Li #7 2-6 6-1 6-3 Petra Kvitova #9 Match data
May 7, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Petra Kvitova #18 6-3 6-1 Na Li #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Kvitova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7 — — — — — — —
22 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31 — — — — — — —
35 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31 — — — — — — —