H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Petra Kvitova vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 3-2

Petra Kvitova holds a 3–2 lead over Svetlana Kuznetsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2016 Montreal fourth round 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #11 7-6(2) 6-3 Petra Kvitova #13 Match data
May 10, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 F Clay Petra Kvitova #4 6-1 6-2 Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 Match data
Jun 1, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova #28 6-7(3) 6-1 9-7 Petra Kvitova #6 Match data
Mar 6, 2014* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Petra Kvitova #9 6-3 2-6 6-0 Svetlana Kuznetsova #30 Match data
Sep 28, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #11 6-4 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Kvitova Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 — — — — — — — 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18