H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Petra Martic vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-1

Petra Martic and Anna Tatishvili are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on grass, while Anna Tatishvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2013 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Anna Tatishvili
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #141 6-1 1-6 6-3 Anna Tatishvili #78 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Anna Tatishvili #52 6-2 6-3 Petra Martic #76 Match data Sep 14, 2012* R16 Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anna Tatishvili #1,071 #50 1,210 1,615 44 93 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Anna Tatishvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1156 1,485 0 0
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 2006 2–3 40.0% #302 1,502 0 0
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #285 1,456 0 0
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #160 1,444 0 0
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #177 1,423 0 0
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #134 1,467 0 0
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0 2011 7–14 33.3% #89 1,493 0 0
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #51 1,602 0 0
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 2013 4–18 18.2% #127 1,492 0 0
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 2014 0–6 0.0% #146 1,438 0 0
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 2015 7–8 46.7% #101 1,507 0 0
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0 2016 3–8 27.3% #200 1,464 0 0
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #516 1,445 0 0
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #998 1,436 0 0
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Martic Anna Tatishvili
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2012 8 7 15 53.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 10 10 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 19 51 70 27.1% 20 32 52 38.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/427 of Petra Martic's and 120/136 of Anna Tatishvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Martic Anna Tatishvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4% 2006 5/5 0.2 7.2 60.9% 52.1% 37.1% 52.3% 41.0% 46.6% 43.7%
17 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6% 2007 4/6 1.8 4.3 63.6% 55.3% 44.7% 41.1% 36.9% 51.3% 41.6%
18 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2% 2008 1/1 2.0 10.0 58.4% 53.8% 35.1% 40.0% 66.7% 46.1% 45.7%
19 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5% 2009 2/2 1.5 5.5 65.3% 52.8% 35.6% 45.0% 41.5% 46.4% 44.0%
20 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6% 2010 10/10 0.4 4.5 72.1% 54.8% 41.7% 48.4% 43.7% 51.0% 42.6%
21 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2% 2011 21/21 0.8 3.9 71.3% 54.6% 40.0% 36.7% 46.6% 50.4% 44.2%
22 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1% 2012 31/34 1.6 4.4 67.1% 57.4% 43.7% 48.3% 51.0% 52.5% 43.6%
23 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3% 2013 18/22 0.9 4.4 63.5% 48.7% 39.9% 44.9% 44.2% 45.5% 40.5%
24 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8% 2014 5/6 1.0 5.4 61.0% 55.4% 33.5% 45.4% 28.9% 47.3% 38.0%
25 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3% 2015 9/15 1.2 1.8 69.7% 59.4% 47.1% 49.3% 53.9% 56.0% 43.1%
26 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4% 2016 11/11 1.7 5.0 64.2% 61.3% 45.2% 54.1% 42.5% 54.8% 39.2%
27 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8% 2017 2/2 0.5 5.5 59.2% 55.0% 28.8% 41.7% 23.1% 43.1% 29.0%
28 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 58.5% 33.3% 17.6% 14.3% 20.0% 26.8% 38.5%
30 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8% — 120/137 1.1 4.4 66.7% 55.2% 41.4% 45.7% 45.5% 50.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Martic Anna Tatishvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.05
16 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 2006 1503 107.1 -1.97 -1.16 0.819 45.5% +3 — — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–0 — -0.07
17 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27 2007 1457 98.2 -1.65 -2.40 0.853 46.6% +30 — — 26.7% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24
18 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36 2008 1445 99.5 +0.37 -0.11 0.846 45.9% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.07
19 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85 2009 1423 97.5 -2.50 -0.92 0.822 45.3% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.08
20 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97 2010 1467 106.2 -2.74 -1.42 0.870 46.8% -3 +70 — 37.5% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.24
21 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21 2011 1493 109.7 -3.47 +0.38 0.892 47.4% -31 +21 +123 37.3% -0.92 4–5 (44%) 2–0 — -0.54
22 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05 2012 1603 121.9 -2.57 -0.58 0.917 48.2% -29 -66 +25 48.6% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.7 +1.20
23 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24 2013 1492 109.8 -6.30 -0.93 0.743 43.1% -24 +61 — 27.5% -1.71 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 95.0 -1.42
24 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11 2014 1438 99.1 -2.75 -1.09 0.721 41.8% -11 — — 0.0% -3.17 — 0–1 — -0.11
25 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05 2015 1507 120.0 -1.39 +0.32 0.979 49.8% -24 +52 — 48.3% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.48
26 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 2016 1465 99.1 -1.19 -1.79 0.868 47.1% -43 +61 +114 40.0% -1.12 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 +0.73
27 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04 2017 1445 96.1 -2.88 -0.25 0.510 37.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
28 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15 2019 1436 97.6 -1.44 +0.62 0.526 33.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.08
30 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72 — 1615 112.7 -3.01 -0.67 0.850 46.4% -21 +16 +80 36.5% -1.09 21–29 (42%) 15–17 (47%) 100.2 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.