H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Martic vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-0

Petra Martic holds a 1–0 lead over Daria Saville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-4 2-6 10-8.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daria Saville
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #135 6-4 2-6 10-8 Daria Saville #21 Match data Jul 5, 2017* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daria Saville #226 #20 2,135 1,858 159 156 50.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Martic Daria Saville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #539 1,493 0 0
17 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #226 1,508 0 0
19 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0 2013 2–6 25.0% #149 1,462 0 0
20 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #233 1,483 0 0
21 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #36 1,675 0 0
22 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0 2016 27–20 57.4% #25 1,836 0 0
23 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0 2017 33–22 60.0% #25 1,794 0 1
24 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0 2018 27–23 54.0% #35 1,781 0 1
25 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0 2019 6–16 27.3% #242 1,603 0 1
26 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0 2020 1–1 50.0% #450 1,617 0 1
27 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0 2021 2–2 50.0% #419 1,645 0 1
28 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1 2022 19–15 55.9% #53 1,738 0 1
29 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1 2023 6–8 42.9% #204 1,686 0 1
30 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1 2024 11–14 44.0% #108 1,667 0 1
31 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2 2025 3–5 37.5% #197 1,661 0 1
32 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Martic Daria Saville
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 13 17 30 43.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2020 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2022 16 10 26 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2023 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2024 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2025 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — 105 101 206 51.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 15 21 36 41.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/427 of Petra Martic's and 287/316 of Daria Saville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Petra Martic Daria Saville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4% 2010 1/1 5.0 4.0 46.6% 59.3% 38.7% 44.4% 33.3% 48.3% 32.7%
17 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2% 2012 2/2 4.0 3.0 63.0% 65.8% 46.5% 33.3% 60.0% 58.2% 55.1%
19 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5% 2013 8/8 2.9 6.5 55.6% 56.5% 36.1% 47.6% 53.1% 47.6% 40.4%
20 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6% 2014 2/2 2.5 6.0 61.7% 57.5% 39.0% 39.8% 50.0% 50.3% 47.0%
21 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2% 2015 31/41 2.5 4.6 66.2% 62.3% 49.2% 54.6% 52.2% 57.6% 41.8%
22 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1% 2016 37/47 1.9 3.9 63.1% 62.0% 47.1% 52.1% 44.7% 56.5% 44.0%
23 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3% 2017 54/55 2.7 4.8 62.9% 64.0% 45.6% 46.7% 50.8% 57.1% 45.6%
24 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8% 2018 48/51 1.8 7.7 65.7% 62.8% 37.3% 53.1% 51.4% 54.1% 45.5%
25 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3% 2019 21/22 1.0 4.2 66.4% 56.8% 43.9% 45.7% 46.5% 52.4% 41.3%
26 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4% 2020 2/2 0.5 5.0 59.8% 62.1% 52.1% 75.0% 73.2% 58.6% 43.5%
27 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8% 2021 4/4 2.0 4.0 57.5% 66.2% 46.6% 52.5% 44.5% 57.9% 47.1%
28 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2% 2022 33/34 2.2 5.0 64.1% 64.5% 44.3% 58.4% 45.6% 57.5% 44.2%
29 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7% 2023 14/14 1.3 4.8 63.7% 61.1% 38.3% 45.4% 53.3% 53.3% 45.8%
30 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1% 2024 25/25 2.1 6.2 67.4% 57.8% 41.9% 59.3% 57.6% 52.5% 45.9%
31 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9% 2025 5/8 1.0 5.0 69.5% 56.9% 39.9% 48.9% 60.2% 51.1% 40.2%
32 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8% — 287/316 2.1 5.3 64.3% 61.8% 43.5% 51.8% 50.3% 55.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Martic Daria Saville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 2010 1494 101.6 +1.65 -1.80 0.633 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
17 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36 2012 1508 107.7 +0.29 +3.39 1.317 57.0% — — — 50.0% +1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06
19 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85 2013 1462 101.0 -2.47 -1.24 0.771 44.0% +3 — — 26.3% -1.63 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.05
20 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97 2014 1483 109.1 +0.25 +0.24 0.946 48.8% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
21 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21 2015 1675 139.1 +0.59 +1.21 0.985 50.0% -73 -34 -29 50.0% -0.05 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 106.8 -1.55
22 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05 2016 1837 143.7 +0.70 +1.71 1.011 50.3% -38 -114 -194 54.4% +0.28 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -1.91
23 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24 2017 1795 139.8 +0.45 +2.93 1.061 51.3% +20 -6 -173 57.7% +0.43 14–13 (52%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 +1.08
24 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11 2018 1781 141.0 -2.19 +2.60 0.991 49.8% +14 0 -108 52.2% -0.08 11–8 (58%) 13–1 (93%) 108.4 -0.58
25 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05 2019 1604 107.6 -2.88 -1.35 0.868 46.7% +84 +22 +39 27.7% -1.28 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 -0.63
26 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03 2020 1617 108.7 +0.59 +1.52 1.052 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.14
27 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04 2021 1646 128.1 +1.67 +2.64 1.117 52.5% +67 — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27 2022 1738 136.6 +0.54 +0.98 1.039 50.8% +82 -119 -95 53.7% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.65
29 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15 2023 1687 124.8 -0.97 +1.63 0.980 49.5% +59 +5 — 45.2% +0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -0.28
30 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13 2024 1668 125.0 -3.56 +1.68 0.966 49.2% +38 -36 +6 45.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.44
31 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20 2025 1662 123.9 -0.99 -0.65 0.821 45.9% +19 — — 35.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.37
32 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72 — 1859 140.0 -0.68 +1.60 0.990 49.8% +11 -29 -92 49.6% -0.03 59–51 (54%) 42–41 (51%) 102.9 -1.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.